|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| November 25, 2001 Avalanche expert: Weak snowpack and lack of knowledge lead to disaster By Miles Blumhardt MilesBlumhardt@coloradoan.com Someone will die in an avalanche in Colorado this year. That's not fatalistic, it's realistic. The last time nobody died in an avalanche
Last year was pretty typical - four fatalities (Colorado's average is five). The casualties occurred while they were either snowmobiling, backcountry skiing or snowboarding, three were male and one was female and all were forewarned. Chances are great you won't die in an avalanche. But tell that to these four. Even if you become avalanche aware, it won't do you a bit of good if you don't use good judgment in the backcountry. Ask those four. I bet their friends and family wish you could. Knox Williams is a Colorado State University atmospheric science graduate, Fort Collins resident and director of the Colorado Avalanche Information Center. The 58-year-old has been involved with avalanche analysis for 31 years, including the past 18 years as director of the country's oldest avalanche center. What is your budget and where does the money come from? We're
How many people in Colorado will die from avalanches this year? Five. It's the right in the middle of what we've been seeing, so that's why I came up with that number. When will most die? In January and February. Historically those two months cause the most problems. The reason is the first two months of winter, November and December, are spent building snowpack. It's pretty weak and shallow, and few people are out because the terrain is too rocky, By January and February, you finally get a deep enough snow cover for good quality skiing, but this snow is building on top of a weak base and people serve as the trigger. Why do we go from not having a fatality on Diamond Peak for many years then have one each in 1999 and 2000? First, the use is going up, and secondly, the type of person who is using the Cameron Pass area, especially Diamond Peak, has changed. We have more snowboarders and a younger bunch of users up there, and these people are getting on the face at times of the year that were never touched 10 years ago because people felt it was too dangerous. After almost every storm, you see tracks on Diamond's face, and that sight will continue and that will continue to kill people who use it during those times. Would you ski the face of Diamond before May? A lot of people say don't ski Diamond until May, but then there is a world of others who don't say that and they are the ones who are actually there. I've done it, but it's not a place I frequent. It's dangerous. I don't think I'm smart enough to make the right decisions on snowpack stability up there throughout most of the winter. If you're not smart enough, then who is? Maybe people who are up there all the time. Maybe they know something I don't. After all, they have made 100 or several hundred safe descents. I've made maybe four. I have a feeling they are rolling
Do people really understand the power of an avalanche? I think not. I don't know that that's really on people's mind. They have spent so many successful days in the backcountry that they start thinking avalanches happen so infrequently that they don't have to worry about avalanches. Last year, we had more than 110 people caught. That's a record. Only four people died. That's a pretty remarkable spread. It shows that most survive, but not because they were good but because they were lucky. Once this stuff starts carrying you down the mountainside and you've lost control, luck is what will save your life. Last year's fatalities in Colorado were a snowmobiler, snowboarder and two backcountry skiers. What does this tell us? Nobody is immune. It's an equal opportunity killer, I guess. Do you see any trends? We've seen such a growth in backcountry snowboarding and snowmobiling the last five years that those two groups are very likely going to be right at the top of those being injured and killed by avalanches. So are snowboarders living up to their extreme reputation? It's a sport made up of numbers of young people. They are amazing, and I applaud them because in the backcountry you get to know a little bit more of yourself. But you can't just push your athletic ability; you gotta get some knowledge and know when you should be there and where you should be. We're talking the testosterone? You got it. Most people can snowboard stuff that skiers can't and so they are going more places. We also are seeing more snowboarders in our classes. But I think what we'll see is a greater percentage of snowboarders being killed in the backcountry than skiers because they are exposing themselves in greater numbers. What's the most prominent avalanche myth? A lot of people don't say it but they think it can't happen to them. A lot of people get very surprised when they get caught. Have you ever been caught in an avalanche? Just two teeny, tiny ones in my early days. But I have had a large one break off at the tip of my skis. It was large enough to break trees a foot in diameter. It was scary. How do people die in an avalanche? Suffocation kills two out of three. We think trauma and the forces involved make up the other one-third. My feeling is that even though people may die from suffocation that the forces are so great that it takes away their ability to try and swim to stay on top of the snow. Why does Colorado lead the nation (on average) in avalanche fatalities? We have the weakest snow cover day in and day out than any other state. A weak snow cover is more prone to collapse. Do you have a favorite avalanche book? A great one that just hit the market is by Bruce Tremper from Utah called "Staying Alive in Avalanche Terrain" (The Mountaineers). It's easy to read and right on target with what people need to know. It deals heavily in the human factors and what gets people in trouble in the first place. Best beacon? I think the Tracker made by Backcountry Access is the best one on the market. There will be a lot of people who would argue violently about that. Ortovox makes an outstanding beacon. But what I have seen in teaching people how to use beacons is the Tracker is so intuitive that there is no mystery how it works. Do beacons save time? They save time; they don't save lives. The sad statistic since beacons have been out 30-some odd years is that 60 percent of people found by beacons are found dead. It doesn't matter any difference if you find them in a couple of minutes if they have hit a tree. You can throw out the window of 20 to 30 minutes of survivability time. That's not really accurate. How much time do you have? You have five to 10 minutes, that's it. What we have discovered is that pinpointing where the person is buried may be the fast part of it. Getting to them is another matter. We teach that you are a competent user of your beacon if you can cover a football-size field of avalanche debris and pinpoint where someone is buried in five minutes or less. But five minutes may already be too late because if you're buried 4 to 5 feet deep, it will take you another 10 to 15 minutes to dig them out. Any promising products coming out to help save lives? We have something coming on the market, an air bag that I think will be helpful. If I were to have one piece of safety equipment, it would be an air bag, not a beacon. I would never not wear a beacon because, who knows, it may save my life. But we know that technology doesn't save people, people save people. What is this air bag? It has been used for three years in Europe, but there has been a problem bringing it to the U.S. because of the way it inflates with its nitrogen cartridges. It is a small pack
What do they cost? Around $500. They may be coming on in the US market soon. Why do people tempt fate? The rewards are huge. When you pull off a good ski descent or climb or doing something radical on a snowboard or snowmachine, it adds to your internal resume. Everyone is willing to take some level of risk. A lot of people in the backcountry have a fairly high tolerance of risk. Final thoughts? Being somebody who has become a senior citizen in the avalanche game, I would like to retire from the this business in a few years feeling really good about how I spent my 30-odd years trying to forecast and teach people personal safety
|
||||||
|
Coloradoan
News | Coloradoan Homes | the
Coloradoan Online | coloradoan.cars.com Copyright 2001 the Coloradoan.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service. (updated August 1, 2001). Send us your questions and comments. |